Description
'Multiple
Qur’anic manuscripts include various calligraphic scripts in numerous
geographical areas. A ninth- century North African Qur’anic manuscript was
written in gold Kufic calligraphy on indigo-dyed parchment. It has been
described as resulting in ‘overwhelming effect’ (Canby, April 2012). ‘A copy of the Qur’an was made, probably in
the twelfth century. The text was written in the New Abbasid in cursive style.
The codex opens with the inscription that the Qur’an is God’s word uncreated’
(Walters Art Museum). A fourteenth century Central Asia folio replaced the
Kufic of earlier Qur’an (Canby, April 2010). Three lines of the text [written
in non-Kufic] fill the present page enclosed in multiple colors outlined ruled
margin (ibid.). A fifteenth century Mamluk manuscript demonstrates three lines
of the text [non-Kufic] with no outlined margin. The chapter title is
surrounded by golden frame' (Faqeer, 2016).
Some
Manuscripts
14th
century central Asia manuscript
Mamluk
era manuscript
India
manuscript
Yemen
manuscript
Sulawesi Qur’an
'‘The earliest
writing form was written on clay tablets. It developed from the culture of the
culture of the Sumerians in Mesopotamia. Existing Purely pictographic signs to
express ideas were improved to represent not the picture but their sound. That
improvement has been called the massive leap of humankind’ (Finkel, 2016).
‘Early
calligraphic inscription included Chinese and Japanese script, and illuminated
bibles from north-west Europe’ (Victoria and Albert Museum). Calligraphic
inscription was inscribed on the Dome of The Rock in Jerusalem built in AD 691
(ibid.).
‘The Nabateans
[seventh century] - Hellenized, produced rock inscriptions…’ (James, April
2012). ‘A linen fragment from the 10th or 11th century
Egypt demonstrates the words ‘In the Name of God’ woven in yellow wool’ (James,
April 2012). Forms of inscriptions were found in 10th century
ceramics from the Samarkand area … [and] architecture [in Iraq and Egypt]’
(James, April 2012). ‘The principles of the calligraphic art [within
manuscripts] can be described in a scientific manner and carefully explained’
(ibid.). ‘Early Kufic script reflects the classical period in which it was
produced’ (James, April 2012). ‘… [A] local Iranian from [of script] …becomes
incredibly complex, convoluted … to the inexperienced eye…was largely confined
to the 19th century Iran…perhaps reflected the political and social
convolutions of the time.’ (James, April 2012). Fifteenth century Egypt Mamluk
era manuscripts constitute a valuable content to Mamluk period literature. ‘Information can be used to create order and
structure.’ (Al-Khalili, 2016)' (Faqeer, 2016).





No comments:
Post a Comment